Accelerating Innovation with the E-ledgers Accounting Method
The E-ledgers Institute is a not-for-profit learning organization advancing rigorous emissions-accounting practices to drive innovation in energy efficiency worldwide.
We advance rigorous emissions-accounting practices to drive innovation in energy efficiency worldwide.
Our founders developed the E-ledgers method for accurately and reliably tracking emissions and removals across even the most complex of supply chains in as close to real-time as practicable. We help pioneering organizations pilot the E-ledgers method, disseminating insights from these pilots, including economy-wide standards for best practice, for the world to harness.
The E-ledgers method introduces a simple, verifiable, and comparable calculation for the incurred net emissions of any product, service, organization, portfolio, or jurisdiction.
Who’s Piloting E-ledgers?
See All Case StudiesHitachi Energy
Hitachi Energy
In 2023, we partnered with Hitachi Energy and three tiers of their supply chain to analyze the E-liabilities of electrical transformers. The case study, published in November 2023, describes the counterintuitive insights from the copper supply chain and on cradle-to-gate emissions of Hitachi transformers discovered during the pilot. The accompanying video demonstrates how the Hitachi pilot calculated and analyzed the emissions data according to the E-liability method.
BMW Group
BMW Group
Our most recent case study is with , which piloted the E-liability approach on a highly customizable part of its iX range of electric cars: the radiator kidney grille. The pilot addresses a common challenge: working with suppliers who lack the capacity to calculate their embedded emissions. This article explores how BMW Group helped equip suppliers for direct emissions measurement and establish protocols to audit data at the source, ensuring data accuracy from the start.
Tata Steel
Tata Steel
We partnered with Tata Steel, which is part of India’s largest conglomerate, the Tata Group, to analyze the carbon content of steel produced through various methods. The compelling element of the pilot is that Tata Steel was able to differentiate what is effectively a commodity product on emissions grounds by using product-level emissions accounting. The accompanying panel discussion dives deeper into the Tata Steel experience.
Heidelberg Materials
Heidelberg Materials
Heidelberg Materials, one of the world’s leading cement producers, piloted the E-liability method focusing on a dominant contributor to cement-related emissions — the conversion of limestone into clinker. By allocating real-time, batch-level emissions to cement products, the pilot demonstrated how accurate and verifiable emissions data can inform both operational decisions and customer choices.
Hitachi Energy
Hitachi Energy
In 2023, we partnered with Hitachi Energy and three tiers of their supply chain to analyze the E-liabilities of electrical transformers. The case study, published in November 2023, describes the counterintuitive insights from the copper supply chain and on cradle-to-gate emissions of Hitachi transformers discovered during the pilot. The accompanying video demonstrates how the Hitachi pilot calculated and analyzed the emissions data according to the E-liability method.
BMW Group
BMW Group
Our most recent case study is with , which piloted the E-liability approach on a highly customizable part of its iX range of electric cars: the radiator kidney grille. The pilot addresses a common challenge: working with suppliers who lack the capacity to calculate their embedded emissions. This article explores how BMW Group helped equip suppliers for direct emissions measurement and establish protocols to audit data at the source, ensuring data accuracy from the start.
Tata Steel
Tata Steel
We partnered with Tata Steel, which is part of India’s largest conglomerate, the Tata Group, to analyze the carbon content of steel produced through various methods. The compelling element of the pilot is that Tata Steel was able to differentiate what is effectively a commodity product on emissions grounds by using product-level emissions accounting. The accompanying panel discussion dives deeper into the Tata Steel experience.
Heidelberg Materials
Heidelberg Materials
Heidelberg Materials, one of the world’s leading cement producers, piloted the E-liability method focusing on a dominant contributor to cement-related emissions — the conversion of limestone into clinker. By allocating real-time, batch-level emissions to cement products, the pilot demonstrated how accurate and verifiable emissions data can inform both operational decisions and customer choices.
Who We Are
The E-ledgers Institute is a not-for-profit learning organization advancing rigorous emissions-accounting practices to drive innovation in energy efficiency worldwide. Our founders developed the E-ledgers method for accurately and reliably tracking carbon emissions and removals across even the most complex of supply chains in as close to real-time as practicable.
Myles Allen - Professor of Geosystems Science, Oxford
Patricia Dechow - Professor of Accounting, Finance, and Economics, USC
Iván Duque Márquez - Formerly, President of the Republic of Colombia
Rebecca M. Henderson - John and Natty McArthur University Professor, Harvard
Chris Liddell - Formerly, White House Deputy Chief of Staff and CFO, Microsoft
Arun Majumdar - Dean, Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability
Lucy Parker - Senior Partner, Brunswick Group
Alicia Seiger - Director of Climate, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
N Venkatram - Country Chair, CDPQ India
Maria T. Zuber - Formerly, Co-chair of the US President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
Launch of the Proto-Standard for Carbon Accounting
The E-ledgers Institute announced the release of a draft Proto-Standard for product-level emissions accounting and auditing using the E-liability method in September 2024. This innovative approach aims to transform how we account for emissions by tracking the cradle-to-gate emissions embedded in products and services as they move through the economy.
Our Proto-StandardCore Conceptual Articles
Accounting for Climate Change
The first rigorous approach to ESG reporting
The E-liability accounting system was introduced as the first rigorous approach to ESG reporting in an article co-authored by Professors Robert Kaplan and Karthik Ramanna and published in the Harvard Business Review (HBR). The article provides a detailed method for assigning “E-liabilities” across an entire value chain, and uses the example of a car-door manufacturer to demonstrate how this may work in practice. The article went on to win the 2022 HBR-McKinsey Award for “groundbreaking management thinking,” which in turn kicked off a series of pilot adoptions of the method by organizations around the world.
Harvard Business Review
November 2021
Accounting for Carbon Offsets
Robust Reporting Principles to Improve Today’s Carbon-Trading Markets
Markets for carbon trading function poorly, and many traded offsets do not actually perform as promised. Without robust protocols for monitoring offsets and in the absence of proper accounting mechanisms, market-based approaches to reducing atmospheric GHG will be vulnerable to misrepresentation and fraud. Our co-founders offer E-assets as a solution, applying fundamental and well-established financial accounting principles to improve the measurement and reporting of carbon offsets. Published in the HBR, the article presents five core principles that define what constitutes an E-asset, when can such an offset be traded in arms’-length exchanges, when can the asset be used to extinguish emissions liabilities, and who bears responsibility for reporting offset impairments after the underlying assets are destroyed, for instance, due to fire or deforestation.
Harvard Business Review
July 2023
Disclosing Downstream Emissions
When are companies accountable for customers’ use of their products?
An increasing number of companies are using the E-liability carbon-accounting method as an important tool for tracking progress toward reducing global emissions in their supply chains. The system does not require formal accounting for downstream emissions – those occurring after a company sells its products to immediate customers, for several good reasons. Certain companies, however, are accountable for disclosing downstream emissions generated by consumers’ use of their products. This article presents three principles to govern accountability and explains how and to what standards of reliability the companies should disclose downstream emissions.
Harvard Business Review
July 2024
Latest Publications and Media
See All Publications and MediaError Check: Correcting basic misconceptions in Bob Eccles’ Forbes column on E-ledgers and the GHG Protocol
Bob Eccles’ recent Forbes column identifies how E-ledgers carbon accounting can overcome the limitations of the GHG Protocol. His article reflects the preferences of many others for major changes to the GHG Protocol and its ecosystem. This note addresses some erroneous claims Eccles makes about challenges with implementing the E-ledgers system.
E-liability Institute
October 2025
Carbon Accounting Must be Overhauled to Save Net Zero. Here’s How
In this Trellis feature, Alicia Seiger, Director of Climate at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and E-Ledgers board member, explains the difference between carbon reporting and accounting. She highlights how reporting provides top-down emissions information, while E-ledgers accounting fully counts and allocates all emissions, enabling durable carbon markets, net-zero governance, decarbonization investment, and accountability.
Trellis Group
September 2025
